I found it very interesting
that Wilma Mankiller served as the first ever female chief of the Cherokee
Nation, and during here reign, was recognized for her many accomplishments,
including, receiving from then President Bill Clinton the Presidential Medal of
Freedom.
During the interview when
asked about sovereignty, Wilma Mankiller expresses her beliefs in that this is
inherent, and reminds the audience that Native tribal governments were in
existence long before the United States government. She also points out something important in
the answer to her question. Sovereignty
is about more than just supreme power, it’s about having control over your own
vision for the future, and your destiny.
This for me really speaks to the significance of recognition of Native
Americans, sovereignty, as a means for identifying with something to which you
belong, real meaning and purpose through association. She goes on to make the
link between sovereignty and self-awareness, self-identity, and health. These are things that she helped to foster
during her leadership.
Mankiller also shows strong
support for culminating the many social, economic, and cultural aspects of
Cherokee Nation consisting of over 240,000 members, to find common ground. And within that challenge, her role as a
leader was to unify members not as social or economic classes, but at Cherokee
Nation members, a unified identity that all could relate to regardless of their
status, a stratification of sorts, as Mankiller refers to it. This stratification is perhaps one of the
biggest contributing factors in the continual revitalization process that
Cherokee tribe, as well as other tribes have gone through historically. Mankiller speaks of the significance of being
able to “hold on to a sense of who we are”, and re-establish family and
community in the midst of upheaval, and this has been common place for Native
Americans throughout all history, especially post-contact, and the relocation
of Cherokee tribes from the Southeast to Oklahoma, leaving behind connections
to sacred ancestral land, their homes, their identity as a people. Upon arrival in Oklahoma “Indian Land,” they
began immediately rebuilding their lives, with a vision toward the future.
In this interview, Mankiller
continues to reference the importance of trusting your own thinking, and the
impact this has on the resiliency of tribal community. “I think if you trust
your own thinking and you truly believe that from within the cultural context
of your tribal community that you can rebuild your nation than you can”
(Mankiller) I viewed this as being significant in light of my earlier reference
to sovereignty, and the ability of Cherokee Nation to control their own vision
and future, something to identify with, as a means to trust your thinking, and
decisions.
I found Wilma
Mankiller’s response when asked about solutions for Native American tribes coming
from within to be very relative to the significance of sovereignty. Mankiller describes the evolution of Native
American reliance on government through a period of great oppression, and the
interest in federal government and certain programs to define who and what
Indians should be. This is changing
though, and we see with the Pan-Indianness movement that Native Americans are
less accepting of being told whom they should be, and how they should
live. Mankiller explains, “we can
articulate our own needs and we actually have the skill to be able to make, to
solve those problems, and make our dreams a reality.” And this starts with building basic
foundations that are rooted in a sense of self-worth, trusting your thinking,
and a strong sense of self-efficacy and belief in oneself. This was essential in Wilma Mankiller's
efforts as a leader to encourage in rural communities to step up and build
their own infrastructure. She states
“all we did was trust people; it’s that simple” (Mankiller). This concept of broad ownership, and moving
away from top down solutions was the approach that she (Mankiller) successfully
used to foster solutions and keep Cherokee Nation moving forward under her
leadership.
References:
Mankiller, Wilma. "Governance, Leadership, and the Cherokee
Nation." Leading Native Nations interview series. Native Nations Institute
for Leadership, Management, and Policy, University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona.
September 29, 2008. Interview.
There are many differences between a Leader and a "manager" of a group. She was a effective leader for her people. Uniting people to form an effective and efficient team is so important to keeping your strength and power alive within a community where many others are against you.
ReplyDeleteGood review of the interview! Her message that sovereignty is inherent is so important. I'm glad you mentioned it because in sense it applies to all of us. As you mentions sovereignty is about more than just supreme power, it’s about having control over your own vision for the future, and your destiny. This is really an issue occuring to many other underrepresented nations around the world.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Eva, I liked how you pointed that out. Her idea of having teams help her although she was Chief shows she didn't let her pride stand in the way of doing what was best her people. Great response
ReplyDeleteI love how you brought up Mankiller's definition for sovereignty, and how it is the right and ability to dictate your path towards the future. An example of this right now is how the Seneca Nation, right around me in NY, is heavily investing in wind energy along the coast of the Great Lakes. This Nation knows that the future is green energy and they are able to follow the pat they feel is right. Mankiller would be proud... I would assume, I do not speak for Mankiller. I am not Mankiller.
ReplyDelete